Population 21.348 million
GDP 171.401 US$ billion
@rating
country
Business climate
assessment
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012(e) | 2013(f) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDP growth (%)
|
-1.6 |
2.5 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
|
Inflation (yearly average) (%)
|
6.1 |
5.8 |
4.1 |
4.6 |
|
Budget balance (% GDP)
|
-6.4 |
-4.1 |
-2.2 |
-1.8 |
|
Current account balance (% GDP)
|
-4.4 |
-4.5 |
-3.9 |
-4.2 |
|
Public debt (% GDP)
|
31.2 |
33 |
34.6 |
34.5 |
| (e) Estimate (f) Forecast | ||||
STRENGTHS
- Country attractive to foreign investors thanks to a large domestic market
- Low public debt burden
WEAKNESSES
- Heavy exposure to the eurozone
- Private sector exposure to exchange rate risk
- Political instability affecting the country’s ability to implement the policies recommended by the IMF
- Current account deficit still high
- Lowest absorption rate of European structural funds in the EU, resulting in substantial institutional and administrative shortcomings
Risk assessment
Weak recovery driven by public investment
After a modest recovery in 2011 driven by exports and exceptional harvests, activity slowed in 2012. Exports, 50% of which go to the eurozone in recession, contracted. The summer drought resulted in poor harvests (-20%) which cut GDP by 1.2 points. Consequently, inflation began to rise again in late 2012, due to rocketing agricultural prices. The effect is expected to continue until September 2013. A domestic demand recovery, though moderate, could take inflation above 5% in mid-2013. But the stagnation of energy prices will prevent a price surge. The central bank will therefore have limited means for sustaining activity. Household consumption will drive growth in 2013 because of a rise in disposable income. Public sector wages rose 7.4% in December 2102, following a 8% increase in June. Consumption will also be driven by a fall in unemployment to 7%, below the EU average. Credit activity is, however, expected to expand only gradually due to banks deleveraging because of the deterioration of their assets. The banking system is under pressure, due to a high proportion of non-performing loans (17%). Moreover, the eurozone banks, weakened by the sovereign debt crisis, hold 80% of Romanian bank assets. They could be compelled to significantly reduce their exposure to Central Europe countries in view of the new Basel III liquidity requirements. Romanian banks are dependent on loans from their parent companies because of the inadequacy of their deposits (loan to deposit ratio at 120%). Public investment will also act as a growth driver, in a context where transport infrastructure needs remain very important. Co-financing by European structural funds will play a key role in this respect.
Uncertainties concerning funding of the current deficit
Moreover, improved use of European structural funds will continue in 2013 and make it possible to limit the increase in the current account deficit. In 2012 the absorption rate exceeded 50% (€9 billion) in the agricultural sector, which is enabling the sector to modernise further, increase its competitiveness and improve farmers’ working conditions. The trade deficit will widen slightly in 2013 due to weak European demand and the slight recovery in domestic demand, which will stimulate imports. The need for external financing (20% of GDP) remained high in 2012 due to the persistent current account deficit and the scale of external debt repayment, the outstanding balance of which amounts to over 70% of GDP. Direct investments, like bank financing could shrink, while the returns demanded by the markets have increased in the wake of the deepening eurozone crisis. So, though Romania regained access to the market in 2010-2011, continued multilateral financial support and European structural fund finance will remain essential for the country’s financial stability. In this context, the leu’s volatility needs watching.
Ongoing fiscal adjustments
The country signed a 24-month Precautionary Stand-By Arrangement with the IMF for a modest amount (3.5 billion euros) in March 2011. This agreement expires in April 2013. However, a two-year extension is expected to be signed. This agreement will strengthen investor confidence in the country’s ability to continue applying the fiscal adjustment measures. This fiscal adjustment has been significant thanks to VAT increases and is continuing by means of privatisations, particularly in the energy and transport sectors, where state owned enterprises are in arrears and whose balance sheets are out of control. The flat-rate tax system could be made progressive. The effectiveness of this change will depend on the tax ceiling, which, unless reassessed relative to the flat rate, could result in less tax collection. Meanwhile, the wealth flight to an informal economy (around 25% of GDP) continues to affect public revenues.
Victor Ponta’s policy strengthened by results of the legislative elections
The December 2012 legislative elections have broadly confirmed (57% of the votes) Victor Ponta and the ruling centre-left coalition. However, this relative stability, stemming from the electoral strength of a coalition of centre-left and centre-right, could prove very fragile if Mr Basescu, the Romanian president, should stand down or be ousted. The major risk in Romania is linked to the fragility of the political stability. A referendum was organised in July 2012 on the initiative of the Social Liberal Union coalition to begin a procedure to oust Mr Basescu. Due to an insufficient participation rate (47%), the result (86.5% in favour of ousting him) was not validated by the constitutional court. The country had three different governments in 2012. The World Bank’s governance indicators underline this political deterioration, as Romania has dropped ten places in terms of political freedom (87th), political stability (106th), and government efficiency (112th). Regulatory quality (54th) and corruption (96th) have improved slightly.


